Sunday, September 20

What if?? Asoka and Buddhism

#1. What if the empire of Asoka the Great had not expanded from Iran to Assam on one extreme and from Tajikistan to the peninsula of Tamil Nadu on another extreme before he waged the Kalinga war?

The history of Buddhism in the world is really fascinating. May be it is the one of the few religions in the world that had been propagated without the means of persecution, crusades, violence and bloodshed. And the most important thing in Buddhist kingdoms is the parliamentary democratic social system employed by the rulers. It is not at all a biased statement when it is stated that "Asoka is definitely comparable to Alexander, Augustus Caesar, Genghis Khan, Timur and Napoleon I except that Asoka was not extra ambitious and did not employ persecution and crusades". Any way, we need to study the both sides of Asoka- his life before the Kalinga war and after the war.

Asoka had several elder brothers and was always envied of his valor and impeccable warrior general qualities. He, in fact, was blood thirsty and successfully ended many military uprisings within the vast kingdom of the Mauryan dynasty. After the suppression of military revolt in Taxsila (East Pakistan), he was sent into exile by his father for the fear of Asoka's murder by his brothers. He was later summoned to handle the uprising at Ujjain. During this battle in which he won, he was badly injured and was treated in hiding in a Buddhist monastery. It was the first time when he was exposed to Buddhist teachings and principles by Buddhist monks and nuns. He had even married a Buddhist woman during his hiding.

Due to his marriage to a Buddhist which was unacceptable that time, Asoka was sent away from Pataliputra  and was made the governor of Ujjain. One of his brothers tried to murder his new born son at Ujjain but in vain. In a fit of rage, Asoka attacked Pataliputra where his brother was hiding and executed him. He became the emperor of Mauryan empire. He later went to Kalinga where his another brother who was also involved in the murder plan was hiding and tried to capture him. Due to the resistance offered by the king of Kalinga, Asoka waged a historical battle against Kalinga and took his vengeance. In this Kalinga war, some 11 hundred thousand people were killed and Asoka repented for this bloodshed caused by him and adopted Buddhism.

Before waging the Kalinga war, Emperor Asoka expanded his kingdom from Iran to Assam on one extreme and Tajikistan to Tamil Nadu on another extreme waging many wars. After adopting Buddhism, he stopped violence and sent many monks to China, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, Egypt and the Middle East to spread Buddhism. One thing we need to consider here is that the neighboring kingdoms of the Mauryan Empire were no match to the Mauryan warfare tactics and were afraid of the bloody history of Asoka and hence did not dare to wage wars even after his adoption of Buddhism. Moreover, it is evident that Mauryan empire was too vast an empire to conquer in a swiftly timed war.

Now what if the empire of Asoka the Great had not expanded from Iran to Assam on one extreme and from Tajikistan to the peninsula of Tamil Nadu on another extreme before he waged the Kalinga war? Many wars would had been waged by the neighboring kings and the Mauryan empire would be destroyed. Then there would not be Teravada Buddhism and its other derivatives in China, Tibet, Cambodia, Sri Lanka. There would not be Taoism from whose principles many martial arts like Kung fu, Ninjutsu, etc., are evolved. There would not be the 24 spoke Asoka Chakra on the Indian flag !!

So, has Buddhism sustained in the world today only due to the vast empire and bloody history of an emperor who ruled some 2300 years back? One thing here, the only reason Buddhism is not predominant in the world today is that the Buddhist emperors did not resort to persecution, crusades, holocausts and bloodshed for its propagation.

Any contradicting comments??


P.S: Be a member of my blog if u like it.. the button is to the left of this page.. 

7 comments:

kalyan Dheeraj said...

i've known a lot of new facts from this post dude..nice one and nice analysis..This is just like butterfly effect...Today's world wouldnt be the same if there was no ashoka or if he had acted differently...Ofcourse the present world is always a result of the past and the future is always a consequence of today's actions..I think its more of a general principle applied to Ashoka and buddhism in this case..

As of now , no contradictions (coz i knew a little bout this..) But I promise to come up with any kind of interesting additions i come across...

Sarath Somina said...

definitely dude.. post additions also..

Abhilash said...

This blog is so goin in my blacklist!!!..jus kiddin.....keep goin dis way nd one day u ll be the editor of HINDU editorial...(fr the language...i really donno the facts of the content..).....nd 1 suggestion...keep postin sum funny..witty posts too...to get ppl lik me bac to visit again...

Abhilash said...

This blog is so goin in my blacklist!!!..jus kiddin.....keep goin dis way nd one day u ll be the editor of HINDU editorial...(fr the language...i really donno the facts of the content..).....nd 1 suggestion...keep postin sum funny..witty posts too...to get ppl lik me bac to visit again...

Sarath Somina said...

Sure mama.. this blog is to be informative n entertaining as well.. comments of dis kind remind me to add entertainment to the blog.. remind me wenever i go in a more of serious tone..

Anonymous said...

May be it just lost its appeal with time. This is the most likely cause for the downfall of any trend or practice or ritual or custom or culture or even religion. Most aspects of it are not practical anyway- What do you say...

Irfan- (You know me)

Sarath Somina said...

@Irfan: Even from olden days wen Buddhist kings wanted to promote Buddhism, they were religiously tolerant.. India was ruled by Pala kings(Buddhist Kings) for 4 centuries. In spite of dis, Buddhism hasnt got much dominant in India. One thing here, Hindus may not convert to Budddhism.. dere r many factors..

I think the main drawback of Buddhism is dat it originated in India where much emphasis in religion is given to rituals, social gatherings in the name of God, etc., If Buddha had been raised up in the mountains of Galilee, the situation wud've been quite different.

You think its the 'Charm' of a religion makes people to follow it?? We see many religions in which the rules, rituals were always 'modified' keeping the ease of people in mind.. That brings out the 'Practicality' of any religion.. Isn't it??